Liar, Liar, Bush - You’re Fired!

Our country has been completely overrun by criminals!  I’m not talking about petty thieves and purse-snatchers running around the streets.  There’s something going on in our executive branch that I think most Americans are aware of, but everyday brings forth a new abomination of freedom and more proof of a Presidency that does not have the American people’s best interest in mind.  There is widespread outrage about our President and his lies to public, his appointees and their lies, and the myriad of illegal activities taking place in Washington. 

Not only has G.W.Bush lied to all of us about the war, why we’re in Iraq, and the progress of the war, but his lies have cost us thousands of American lives and he feels completely confident to stay the course, because clearly victory is imminent.  There’s no doubt that this President is far from the sharpest knife in the drawer, but being an idiot isn’t a crime (unfortunately).  Lying to the American public about justification for a war that has cost thousands of lives however, is a crime.   How long have we heard one story after another about why we’re going to Iraq, why we’re in Iraq, the “success” we’re having in Iraq?  This President has told us lie after lie and he’s still in office.  This is baffling to me.  Not only should he absolutely not be in office, but why isn’t he serving time with other criminals like himself?  I can’t think of a bigger, more insidious series of crimes - moral, ethical, and criminal in nature - that a President could commit beyond what Bush has done.  Spying on American citizens?  By the laws of America, isn’t treason punishable by death? He has made it so I don’t feel any safer from terrorists overseas than I do from the administration which has pledged to “protect” me from them.  I sit around everyday not knowing what the next lie is going to, be or what the next abomination of freedom and “justice” will be at the hands of this President. 

From his lies about a war that has claimed thousands of American lives, to illegal wire tapping and taking absolutely no ownership of his lies and crimes, Bush is just a horrible human being, extremely misguided, or incredibly stupid (perhaps all three) …in my humble opinion.  How can a President in a democracy lie to his people as he sends them to die in war, commit criminal activity like illegal wire tapping, appoint a slew of corrupt politicians without an ounce of integrity between them, and then take no responsibility and have no apologies or remedies to ease the plight of the American people and bring some sense of integrity to this administration? 

Beyond all of that, appointing and supporting an attorney general who is amazingly untrustworthy speaks volumes about the moral grain of our President.  Granted, it hasn’t been proven that Alberto Gonzales has lied to congress, but there’s no doubt that he is not particularly trustworthy and that his testimony was amazingly vague and cloudy, and full of contradictions.  We might be able to find the truth if congress was allowed to investigate as they should.  Having the trust of the American people is one of the most important things to consider in positions like the presidency, vice presidency, attorney general, and so on.  These are the people who run our country, represent all of us, and are supposed to make the decisions that are in the best interest of the American people.  At least congress is trying to get to the bottom of this issue with Gonzales, bringing the truth to light.  If it turns out that he didn’t lie and is just amazingly inept when it comes to testimony, then so be it (hard to fathom given that he’s AMERICA’S TOP LAWYER).  Maybe the truth is that he just doesn’t know how to be straight forward.  Knowing that our Attorney General isn’t a liar might at least provide a certain peace of mind that every American should be entitled to - being able to trust our leaders to be honest with the public.  Unfortunately, we have a President who won’t explain a thing, but simply expects that it’s enough for him to unconditionally support this man who’s testimony is … questionable at best… and be away from the White House for a total of over a year of vacation in a 4 year presidency.  I understand that Bush and Gonzales are buddies, but the subject of illegal wire tapping isn’t a schoolyard debate, the truth of which is inconsequential.  Buddies or not, Bush has an obligation to prove himself and his appointees competent and trustworthy on all sides, not just the issue of committing a crime against Americans.  So what if Bush supports Gonzales?  That doesn’t really make me feel any better about his “honesty” in this testimony.   How are we supposed to be content with this just because Bush supports and believes in his friend?  I don’t know Alberto Gonzales and I don’t trust Bush anymore than I believe the sky is pink and purple polka-dotted. 

So where does that leave me?  I’ve got a President I can’t trust (even if I wanted to) who supports an Attorney General who perjures himself, saying “he’s done nothing wrong”.  Not to mention that fact that the two of them have helped to make it so that my phone can be tapped illegally - at their discretion - because terrorists are out there and they’re dangerous.  Our government is dangerous!  What if Bush does some random wire tapping (and there’s nothing to stop him from doing it)?  Admittedly, I don’t have anything nice to say about this President or his staff.  Will I land in jail for not supporting the lies of this administration?  I wouldn’t be the first.

I heard on MSNBC today about a couple who wore anti-Bush shirts to one of his speeches at a West Virginia Bush rally at the State Capitol (public ground) in 2004 and they were arrested for not changing their clothes just prior to Bush discussing how his war will help to preserve our American freedoms. The charges were later dropped, but the couple sued and settled for $80,000.  I wonder where that $80,000 came from - the pockets of the arresting officers? Homeland Security? Bush himself?  No, it came from my tax dollars (you know, the ones not being spent on education or saving an environment that won’t support life in a few hundred years).  While it would be incredibly appropriate to hold these people responsible for this couple’s loss of a freedom granted by the Constitution, they have yet to receive an apology from the White House - very consistent with the lack of responsibility of this administration.  So, just as with everything else, the taxpayers bare this burden.  If our right to express ourselves is next on Bush’s list of anominations, he might as well come get me now and declare this the Dictatorship of America because as far as I am concerned, Bush has no right to be in any position of power.  Look at what this nation has been reduced to under his Presidency!  It’s appauling.

So, in conclusion, I want to make sure I have this straight.  After the 9/11 attacks, Bush vowed to make us feel safer and more secure in our homes.  Since then, an administration full of corrupt and lying politicains have given themselves the right to invade our right to privacy without court approval, lied to the public about why we’re still fighting and losing a war that has has no clear meaning to this day, and threatened our right to freedom of speech.  Bang up job Mr. Pesident!  Despite all your clearly justified and valiant efforts (I’m in the addiction treatment field, perhaps someone needs to explain denial mechanisms to this guy), I feel less safe and less proud to be an American than ever before.  I can, however credit this administration with one thing - they have sucessfully managed to hold the American liberties and ideals, which have set America apart as a free and proud land, hostage over a 7 year period.  I don’t know what kind of character fault it takes to do these things, but whatever it is, Bush and his coherts have a ton of it.

Age of Alcoholism

I’ve been hearing a lot of debate about lowering the legal drinking age to 18, and I can’t say I support that kind of move.  Granted, underage alcohol consumption is a big problem, but I don’t see how lowering the legal drinking age would eliminate the underlying problems of underage drinking.  Sure, it would make it legal for teenagers to drink, but that doesn’t do anything to solve the problems inherent with alcohol abuse.  The issue of minors drinking alcohol isn’t so much the illegality of it, but moreso the responisiblity it carries.  People over the legal drinking age have enough problems with alcohol and responsibilty which all tie into maturity and education.  How in the world would a teenager be better equipped to deal with the heavy responsibility of alcohol consumption any better than those who are over the current legal drinking age?

Here’s the issue.  As we grow up, we obtain certain responsibilities and rights with age, not necessarily maturity or ability to handle that responsibility.  For example, how many of us see, on a regular basis, poeple behind the wheel who clearly shouldn’t be driving and ask the question “who the &%$# gave him a license?”  At 16, in most states, we can get a license and drive.  At 18, we can enroll in the miliarty and vote.  Do all voters have a comprehensive, or even rudimentary knowledge of our governemnt and crutial issues on which we base our votes?  I doubt it.  Then, at 21, we get to drink alcohol (legally, at least).  How many “just turned 21″ year olds have at least a decent undertsanding of the dangers of alcohol?  For that matter, how many 25 year olds or 30 year olds have that knowledge? 

I work in the addiction field and I see and hear about the numerous ways alcohol destroys lives every day.  Furthermore, I used to be a bartender for several years and I’ve watched the 21 and 22 year olds come in and drink alcoholic beverage after alcoholic beverage (of the long island sort), trying to get as wasted as possible or classes are out for the semester so let’s get hammered.  Going out with friends, drinking some alcohol and having fun is all good.  Most of have done it and continue to do it in what I hope are responosible ways.  However, the majority of youngsters I have seen in bars have this misconception that the more alcohol they drink, the better, thus the long islands (personally, I think they’re gross, but it’s a lot of alcohol in one drink so I guess that’s the appeal). I remember what it was like when I was 21 and finally got to start using my real ID, so I’m not knocking these kids.  I understand.  I’t’s exciting to be able to hang out in the clubs and drink alcohol with the “cool grown people”.  I get it.  The issue though, is that mentality is amazingly immature.  It’s no one’s fault, it’s just part of a process called growing up.  Drinking alcohol isn’t about fitting in or being like someone else.  It’s a personal choice and with that choice comes a great deal of responisiblity, like being able to know when you’re in danger of alcohol poisoning.  Let’s get that one clear off the bat.  Alcohol poinsoning happens when you’re vomitting and end up passed out drunk from drinking alcohol.  It’s not necessarily a trip to ER, although it ends up being just that for many.  Granted, this considered to be a mild case of alcohol poisoning, but we all know what hangovers feel like and that’s the result. 

It’s not enough for us to put kids through school and then give them free license to go have a free for alcohol binge just because it’s legal.  Even at 21, kids aren’t educated on the dangers of alcohol abuse.  I’d be willing to bet that less than 50% of kids know what it is that physically causes alcohol intoxication.  Most probably think coffee is the antidote (since that’s what makes the characters in movies feel better), but newsflash - coffee further dehydrates the system, making alcohol intoxication worse.  If there were programs and systems in place that actually educated kids on responsible alcohol consumption and the dangers of alcohol abuse, maybe that would further justify the potential of lowering the legal drinking age, but then we still have to be concerned with the mental capacity of teenagers to handle the responsibilty of alcohol.  These kids have a mental disadvantage in comparison with adults.  Our brains mature just as we do and at 18, I doubt the maturity is present and the brain is equipped to handle many things, including alcohol consumption.  I don’t believe age should be the qualifier as to what we can and cannot do.  It should go much deeper than that, in my opinion.  We have to take a test to drive, we have to be qualified to hold a job, get an apartment, buy a car.  But all we need to consume the most dangerous drug out there, is an ID that verifies our age.  Alcohol is responsible for hundreds of thousands of fatal vehicular accidents, thousands of deaths due to acute alcohol poinsoning, and millions of shattered dreams caused by alcoholism.  Taking all of that into mind, our current laws have absoltely no prerequisite to consume alcohol - only living for 21 years. 

I propose a lot more be done about alcohol education for everyone, but especially youngsters.  Those DUI classes so many of us are familiar with, should be required for kids before they can legally drink, not after they wrap their car around a pole because they excercised poor judgement in an alcoholic haze.  Until we have provisions in place to ensure the safety of tomorrow’s drinkers, I think the current legal age for alcohol consumption is just fine.  This still doesn’t change the fact that we need to do much, much more about drug and alcohol education in this country for all people, not just teenagers in danger of joining the grown up world too early.

Drug Rehab Funding For The Poor

We have been overwhelmed with recent news of public figures and teen “idols” getting into trouble with drugs and checking into high priced rehab centers that seem to resemble more of a vacation destination than a self improvement drug rehab. From Al Gore III, to Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, it seems like the funds for rehab are unlimited while the majority of addicts trying to get help have spent all their money on their addiction and cannot afford to get into treatment centers without the assistance of federal or state funding. Usually these kinds of treatment centers have long waiting lists and substandard treatment due to low funding.

It saddens me to no end that public figures such as Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan are looked up to in many circles and considered to be idols with millions of little girls wanting to “be like” them when they grow up. Read More »

Drug Rehab Centers Get A Bad Name

With the recent influx of celebrities entering drug rehab centers for a quick dryout session, to appease the public, or as the result of a “nudge from the judge”, drug rehab programs are getting a bad name. As the founder of a public benefit addiction treatment help organization, I’ll attempt to set the record straight. Drug rehab programs do work, just not if the individual attending treatment doesn’t want them to, and hence doesn’t make any attempt whatsoever to remain sober following treatment. Drug rehab programs offer guidance and rehabilitation, not a magic cure for addiction and alcoholism. Otherwise they’d be called “Addiction Cure Programs.” I know this because I went to rehab multiple times before ever managing to stay sober for any significant period of time after treatment. A little about my story is published on the about treatment centers page of www.treatment-centers.net. I had to go to treatment multiple times because when I first went, I didn’t go for myself - I didn’t go because I wanted to stop being an addict, stop doing the drugs I loved so much, or stop having fun and partying. I went because others wanted me to, and because my life had become so unmanageable I needed a “break”. I had no intention of staying off drugs and alcohol.

Many of the celebrities stepping through the revolving door of drug rehab centers lately are doing so at a very young age - Lindsay Lohan for one, apparently just turned 21. Is it really such a surprise that she went out drinking? Many young people drink alcohol for their “coming of age”. It only comes once, and is a milestone (whether or not those laws serve the public interest or public health is another question). When I was that age and going to drug rehab, I simply wasn’t ready to stop yet. An individual can go the the best drug rehab center in Malibu, learn all the tools for sobriety, and still not stay sober after leaving treatment. They have to want sobriety. They have to be sick and tired of being sick and tired of suffering the negative consequences of drug addiction.

Additionally, these people are rich. Drug addicts often stop abusing drugs when they can’t afford their drug of choice any more. With top celebrities, this never happens, which is unfortunate. I truly believe that if there was a provision in the law for judges to require that certain individuals under specific circumstances (multiple offenders, under a certain age, with income over a certain level) have to match their expenditures on drug rehab programs ($50,000-$100,000+ easily for a 30 day treatment stay at these Malibu rehab centers) with donations to publicly funded treatment centers, and a stipulation that if they re-offend, their money is placed in a trust of some sort with someone who audits all expenditures, we’d see these celebrities more interested in getting into recovery.

Also, recovery needs to be fun. With the prevailing feeling among these celebrities being that partying is the definition of fun, and is necessary to “fit in” and “be cool”, the outlook for recovery is slim. Recovery can be fun, but for these celebrities and public figures - Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Al Gore III, and Mel Gibson to name a few - they need to experience it first hand. They need to go to rehab centers that make recovery fun, and offer them something different than what they are used to in their everyday lives - When rehab is like a resort, it is like a reward for years of hard fought drug using and law breaking. I don’t have a personal masseuse and chef in my everyday life, but if I go to one of these Malibu drug treatment centers, or a place like Cirque Lodge in Utah where Lindsay Lohan currently is, I get that treatment. I don’t know about anyone else, but that sounds to me like a pretty nice place to be, easy to look at as a reward for drug use and illegal behavior. Perhaps these celebrities need to learn how to live like the rest of the world, and maybe then they’ll understand that they are subject to the same laws of behavior and propriety.

Drug rehab, alcohol rehabilitation and dual diagnosis treatment does work. Drug addiction treatment centers do teach the tools necessary for recovery from addiction and alcoholism. Even free, publicly funded programs do this, let alone $50,000 Malibu treatment centers. Detox programs handle the physical withdrawal part of the equation, and short-term and long-term addiction treatment centers teach the tools for recovery, delve into the underlying issues and causes of the substance abuse, and repair the psychological and emotional damage of the addiction. The rest is up to the individual, and they have to want it. It is often said that if an individual puts as much energy and investment into their treatment and recovery from addiction as they did into obtaining and using drugs, their sobriety is virtually insured. From first hand experience with drug rehabilitation, I know this to be true.

More on Needle Exchange…

In response to some very worthwhile and intuitive comments on this issue, I thought I’d do a follow-up post clarifying some of my feelings on the subject. My issues with this program lie in the limited benefits of needle exchange after weighing in all the factors of drug addiction.

Yes, this program may prevent many HIV/AIDS cases contracted through use of infected needles and that’s great. Truly, one live saved is worth the effort no matter what.

But I remain weary when I think about the idea that this program is not doing much to actually target the problem of addiction itself and ignoring the blantant illegality of drug paraphernalia. I agree with my husband when he suggests that the taxpayers might be better served by their money going to beds for treatment centers.
Having clean needles may help with one of many dangerous and devastating aspects of drug use. But it also perpetuates drug use, leaving a plethora of other devastating effects of addiction unaddressed.

I just feel that there has got to be a better way for us to reach out to addicts and help them get their lives back on track, as opposed to handing out clean needles to continue the same dangerous and addictive behavior.
Clearly, we all agree that more funding needs to go into drug treatment and addiction education programs, and I guess until the day comes when we can see that idea become more of a reality, any program (like the needle exchange program) is like putting a band-aid on an amputated limb. It may very well save some people from HIV/AIDS, but it leaves the door open, further perpetuating drug use and addiction. And that is the bigger problem, the effects of which can be felt from every angle.

Close
E-mail It